The Huskies Win!/ Were Karmically Rewarded for Honestly Reporting their Academic Shortcomings.

During the post-game celebration last night, University of Connecticut point guard Shabazz Napier caused a stir by announcing to the crowd,

"Ladies and gentlemen, you're looking at the hungry Huskies. This is what happens when you ban us. Last year, two years, we worked so hard for it..."

Speak for New England, Shabazz!

Thought his boldness can be written off as empty emotion, what Napier said summarized the anger, and now vindication that the University of Connecticut and its fans have felt in the past two years.

Last year, Connecticut was banned from the NCAA tournament due to its poor Academic Progress Report (APR). This metric aggregates classroom performance and graduation rate amongst a program's athletes to judge whether they're meeting off-court standards.

It was an embarrassment for a state the values education, and a university with a strong academic reputation. 

Connecticut deserved the sanctions. However, those who follow college basketball tend to ignore the deeper implication: The University of Connecticut is an honest when it comes to its athletes.

By now, its an open secret that big-time college basketball programs take advantage of lax regulation and complicit faculty to boost the grades of middling students. In the past month, the University of North Carolina has come under scrutiny following the release of a juvenile, 146-word 'essay' on Rosa Parks, which contributed to one student-athlete receiving an A-minus for an introductory course in African-American Studies. 

In fairness to the NCAA, it did drop the hammer on UNC's football program in 2012. Though the salient violations were for impermissible benefits, they did include one count of academic fraud.

The program was not punished for poor grades; it was punished for lying.

In a twisted way, Connecticut was punished for telling the truth. Rather than create an academically bankrupt program meant to perpetuate the NCAA's myth of the student-athlete, UConn held its players to real collegiate standards. Connecticut does things the right way, even when that means admitting wrongdoing. Its players are real students, and for this reason, it is a worthy champion of college basketball.

Shabazz Napier was hit hard by last year's sanctions, but that frustration fueled him to work harder. One year later, he has a second national championship, and a legitimate degree in Sociology to show for it.

Can the Uconn Huskies Really Win This Thing? Yes!

Despite being an imbalanced, undersized team that over-relies on its best player, the University of Connecticut Huskies are only two wins away from their fourth national championship.

Coach Kevin Ollie has done a fine job playing to his team's strengths. The Huskies have fielded a strong defense all season thanks to the rim protection afforded by the center tandem of Phillip Nolan and Amidah Brimah. Having an athletic 7-footer on the court for most of the game allows an otherwise small team to pressure the ball, and disrupt plays before they develop.

On offense, the versatile scoring of DeAndre Daniels and Ryan Boatright, and underrated facilitating from Niels Giffey have made it difficult for opponents to key in on the team's centerpiece, point guard Shabazz Napier.

On top of this, the Huskie's superior foul shooting makes them a tough out late in games. Several years ago, the coaching staff adopted an unusual approach towards practicing free throws, inspired by Steve Nash. In their last two games against Iowa State and Michigan State they are 41-44 from the foul line. That comes out to 93%, right around the 90% career average of the Greatest Living Canadian.

How do you make the Final Four against heavily favored opposition? Just learn to do this. 

Though these factors contribute, the Huskies will win a national championship because of Shabazz Napier. Just not for the reason everyone thinks. 

Though Napier's scoring has carried the team, he is an imperfect offensive player. He is still developing as a passer, and sometimes forces plays that aren't there. His lack of size and athleticism makes him inconsistent around the rim, despite his long highlight reel. In an eerie parallel with Kemba Walker's championship season (2010-11), Napier only shoots 43% from the field.

What Napier really brings is confidence and maturity. At the college level, mental discipline is a premium skill, most common in third and fourth year players. Observers chalk this up to experience, but the cause is more profound than that.

Players undergo tremendous brain development from their late teens to their early twenties. By their senior year, many players have acquired advanced mental skills such as foresight and impulse control that are well beyond those of even the most talented freshmen.

In this regard Napier is a superior player. His approach is consistent, regardless of the score, or his own performance. He attacks the rim, because drawing fouls has an impact beyond one possession. Most of all, he sets an example that his team can follow.

Upperclassmen like DeAndre Daniles, Niels Giffey, and Ryan Boatright are not as consistent scorers, but they don't let cold shooting take them out of their game. More importantly, it does not deter them from playing tough, active defense, often against larger players.

This is the Shabazz Napier's biggest impact. Like Kemba Walker before him, he has his team playing like young men, not jittery teenagers.

OK, Fine, You Twisted My Arm... Let's Talk About March Madness

The purpose of this space is for me to write about whatever is on my mind. I think about a lot of stuff, and reflect that in my choice of topics.

However, this blog is powered by Blogger, which means that Google spies on you, my readers, and tells me what you really think.

According to traffic patterns, you like posts about sports and TV. Who am I to ignore what really matters to you?

With the Sweet 16 approaching, here is...

A Six-Pack of Thoughts on the NCAA Basketball Tournament So Far (By the way, I'm still looking for a beer sponsor.)

1. Is it clear that Jim Boeheim is a second-rate basketball coach?

He has reached 900 wins beating up on the small liberal arts schools and Directional-States of the Northeast, while rarely hanging with quality opposition.

Yes, every big program pads is schedule, and yes, he has won 5 Big East Tournaments and a National Championship in 2003.

However, this year's loss to 11th seeded Dayton is yet another in a history of ugly tournament defeats for the perennially "loaded" Orange.

Even more damning is the record of his players in the NBA. Carmelo Anthony stands as the only unequivocal success to emerge from a Boeheim coached team. In the last few years alone, players like Jonny Flynn, Wesley Johnson, and Fab Melo have reinforced the preconception of Syracuse as a school which takes in talented players and leaves them unprepared for the big time.

Even promising young professionals like Dion Waiters and Michael Carter-Williams are marked by the bad defensive habits they learned in upstate New York.

Boeheim's 2-3 zone may spare his players from working hard on defense, but good teams rip it apart. It's a lazy strategy that gives players a bad foundation to build on. There's a reason no one else uses it.

Boeheim is a good recruiter, and upsets happen, but in his tenure, he has more tournament loses to double digit seeds (6), than Syracuse has Final Four appearances (5) in its entire history.


2. God Bless Mercer.

I have no idea where Mercer is. I not sure if it's an accredited school. I'm not going to look either of those things up, because I've gotten this far in life being ignorant of Mercer, and I'm not changing now.

However, they beat Duke, which for some reason is a National Priority every year. In general, success breeds resentment, but America's feelings for the Blue Devils make the Yankees or Lakers seem likeable.

If you subscribe to the theory that sports are a subconscious surrogate for war, then Mercer's upset over Duke is equivalent to re-assassinating Osama bin Laden. We are that united in our desire to see Coach K's squad go down.

I'm not sure why we hate Duke so much, especially while John Calipari is still active. Nonetheless, God Bless Mercer.


3. While we're on the subject of Basketball Hate; I hate these teams:

Florida: The University of Florida is a third-rate diploma mill with nothing to stand on besides it's basketball and football teams. I wouldn't make snap judgements about a graduate of large public school like Michigan State or Indiana. If someone confessed to being a Florida Gator, I would question their intelligence and credentials.   

Arizona: Like Florida, but more so.

Lousville: I hate Rick Pitino more than the school. Everything about his bearing and personality reminds me of a sleazy used car salesmen (or, as they're known in college basketball: Top Recruiters). Furthermore, he is not forgiven for his embarrassing stint as Head Coach of my Boston Celtics.


4. These are the teams I'm pulling for.

Harvard: The Crimson were eliminated in the Round of 32 by Michigan State, but seeing an academically rigorous school make some tournament noise is always nice (unless it's Duke).

Stanford: Also an academically rigorous school, though one with a deeper commitment to athletics than Harvard. Yesterday they knocked off the second seeded Kansas Jayhawks, while holding Andrew Wiggins to four points.

Hopefully, this is the game NBA executives remember when they're over-drafting Doug McDermott and Julius Randle, thus letting Wiggins slide to my Boston Celtics around picks 5-7.

While I'm daring to dream, perhaps the NBA will give Joel Embiid the Jared Sullinger treatment with regards to his back problems; letting him fall to our late first round pick via Brooklyn. Be still, my beating heart.

Connecticut: In case the Jim Boeheim critique didn't tip you off, the Huskies are my team. MUSH, HUSKIES, MUSH!!!!

Those who think Connecticut is just Shabazz Napier and friends and have another thing coming, namely this.


5. Here is my obligatory shot at the NCAA.

The NCAA is a corrupt and borderline criminal organization. It's only regulatory principle is 'out of sight, out of mind.' It operates in naked defiance of the 13th Amendment.

That said, the problems of minor-league basketball are minor indeed. Let the games continue.


6. The players who wear t-shirts under their jerseys need to stop.

I don't know why they do it, but I assume it's because they are afraid to show their underdeveloped musculature to a national audience.

Whatever the reason, it looks lame. Puny or not, those pythons need to breathe.  

Worse still, they're making fashion victims out of the pros.

This year the NBA and Adidas have rolled out horrendous sleeved jerseys that take inspiration from the t-shirt look.

They even make LeBron James looks like a rec-leaguer.